Rita Lucy, I just got a whole bunch of disturbing news today.There have been a number of things with both mine and my husbands medical problems that have fallen through the cracks.We have only found these things because we are changing doctors and I have demanded to hand carry my medical records.Your symptoms give me a feeling that I want to communicate to you to make sure you know exactly what kinds of tests you are getting run and what for.My symptoms have been a lot like yours.I found out to day that the last time I was in the ER with belly pain and the whole IBS symptom thing and a pulse of 119, that the ER doctor ordered a test called a Troponin - Ithe report showed myocardial injury extensive enough to conform with AMI"accute myocardial infarction"The diagnosis on the ER report states that the test also conforms with the diagnosis of AMI as defined by the W.H.O.below is a definition I found on a heart siteThere have been many technological advancements for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) over the past decade. Nonetheless, practical detection of AMI remains challenging in the emergency department (ED) setting. About 4.5 million people present annually at ED's in the United States with signs and symptoms suggestive of AMI. Of the 4 million who were admitted for at least 23 hours, about 2.7 million (67%) had no AMI. A more troubling statistic is that of the 5000,000 patients that were not admitted and sent home, 2-3% did indeed have AMI's that were missed during the ED evaluation. The current criteria for diagnosis of AMI are based on the modified criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) which require the presence of at least two of the following three features: chest pains, evolutionary electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, and elevated serum levels of cardiac enzymes such as the MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB).
http://www.dynacare.com/quarterly4.htm so, given that news of my current reality I not sure what to do next.This little black hole of medical space is the same black hole of an Emergency Room that sent my husband home while he was gushing blood out his rectum.We had to go to another hospital a few days later to finally get some care on the bleeding.I found all this stuff in my records and I called my old gastroenterologists office in another state and they were kind enough to tell me what the tests results meant and they have given me some good information as to what needs to be tended.In additon to that heart thing, there was alos a test that showed blood in my urine.There is no infection and the gastro office says that it's possible that something is bleeding inside of me too.In the ER report on my husband during the bleeding episode, the hospital said that his x rays didn't show anything so they used that as the reason to send him home.However, the x ray report reads that he had an enlarged spleen.Neither the gastro doctor nor the internal med doctor took the time to look at that report.And there's more.I'll catch up on it all as I vent here.I'm pretty mad right now.So, get a hold of your tests and records and do a little bit of investigative homework.There's just no telling these days.Kamie