Joined
·
2,408 Posts
Tried those magnets too. For migraines. Just more $$$$$$$ down the rat hole.
Should have known better.


http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm "Another controversy revolves around the issue of when to use the north, or negative, pole and when to use the south, or positive. One school of thought is based on the ideas of Davis and Rawls, whose studies done in the 1930s suggest that exposure to biomagnetic negative poles enhance health, while biomagnetic positive poles exacerbate disease. More recently, Dr. William Philpott has been championing the Davis and Rawls point of view and drawing conclusions based upon his own clinical experience. Here is what Philpott feels each pole will do:North (Negative) PoleRelieves pain Reduces swelling Promotes tissue alkalinization Promotes sound, restful sleep Increases tissue oxygenation Calms the nervous system Assists in relief of addictive tendencies South (Positive) PoleAccelerates growth indiscriminately Increases swelling Promotes tissue acidity Decreases tissue oxygenation Makes sleep less sound and restful Promotes anxiety There are those who support the claims of Philpott. Yet, scientists wishing to duplicate the work of Davis and Rawls cannot find any data to work from. And a search of the literature shows Philpott to be making more claims than scientific evidence can support at this time. Philpott also promotes his own magnets and may therefore be biased. This is not to say that these claims are false; however, more scientific research confirming or disproving these claims needs to be done.The only "quote: This sounds made up.
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm "Another controversy revolves around the issue of when to use the north, or negative, pole and when to use the south, or positive. One school of thought is based on the ideas of Davis and Rawls, whose studies done in the 1930s suggest that exposure to biomagnetic negative poles enhance health, while biomagnetic positive poles exacerbate disease. More recently, Dr. William Philpott has been championing the Davis and Rawls point of view and drawing conclusions based upon his own clinical experience. Here is what Philpott feels each pole will do:North (Negative) PoleRelieves pain Reduces swelling Promotes tissue alkalinization Promotes sound, restful sleep Increases tissue oxygenation Calms the nervous system Assists in relief of addictive tendencies South (Positive) PoleAccelerates growth indiscriminately Increases swelling Promotes tissue acidity Decreases tissue oxygenation Makes sleep less sound and restful Promotes anxiety There are those who support the claims of Philpott. Yet, scientists wishing to duplicate the work of Davis and Rawls cannot find any data to work from. And a search of the literature shows Philpott to be making more claims than scientific evidence can support at this time. Philpott also promotes his own magnets and may therefore be biased. This is not to say that these claims are false; however, more scientific research confirming or disproving these claims needs to be done.The only "quote: This sounds made up.