Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Digestive Health Support Forum banner
1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Has anyone had the test where you swallow a tiny camera to get view of entire Intestines?If so, why was this test ordered? Was the prep the same as for colonoscopy?Were the results helpful?Thanks!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
34,955 Posts
The camera pill is primarily to look at the small intestine, it doesn't have the battery life to see the whole colon.Usually for the camera pill the prep is along enough fast that the small intestine is empty.If you want to look at the colon without a colonoscopy they do what is called a virtual colonoscopy with a CT scanner and that is the same prep as a regular colonoscopy. The problem with the CT scan is if they see anything they will then need to do a regular colonoscopy to take the biopsies or remove the polyps.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
There is a new PillCam for Colon views.Perhaps too new for use in USA?
Medical knowledge and technology sure has come a long way from the ancient times where sickness was attributed to the devil and his cohort, and in this day and age where going under the knife often meant saving a life, the PillCam Colon 2 makes its appearance, going one up on its predecessor of the same name (sans the progression in number, of course). This endoscopic capsule was specially designed for imaging of the large intestine, and has picked up European approval recently, having been unveiled at the Gastro 2009 Conference in London, England.During the presentation of the PillCam Colon 2, independent investigators presented results of a 98-patient feasibility study that involved the ingestion of this particular medical marvel. The conclusion that these investigators came to was the PillCam Colon 2 is a "safe and effective method to visualize the colon and detect colonic polyps." To add further weight to its effectiveness, an article discussing the study has been accepted for the December 2009 edition of the journal Endoscopy. Compared to colonoscopy, the PillCam Colon 2 pointed towards a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 76% in detecting polyps greater than or equal to 6 mm and a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 89% in detecting polyps greater than or equal to 10 mm. Apart from its seemingly higher degree of accuracy when it comes to detecting polyps of various sizes compared to a regular colonoscopy, the PillCam Colon 2 also offers the fringe benefits of not requiring the use of sedation, intubation or air insufflation during the procedure, which ought to give patients a sigh of relief - at least for those who are afraid of going through the regular rigors of a colonoscopy. This convenient method of visualizing the colon relies on bi-directional communication between the PillCam Colon 2 and the DataRecorder, allowing it to track the capsule's motion in the GI tract in order for the image capture rate to be adjusted to maximize colon tissue coverage.Source: Medgadget
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
34,955 Posts
Hadn't heard about the new generation. Don't know any more than you do about it.I do know the first generation one only has about 6 hours of battery life. The good news is it sees all the parts of the small intestinal lining that nothing else can.However there is still the same problem that if you have a polyp or an area that looks funny they still have to do a regular colonoscopy to know what is really going on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
I had the capsule endoscopy done. It was relatively simple and painless.Unfortunately, results came back completely normal so I still don't have any answers.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top